Coverage
The research checks whether a signal is broad enough to discuss publicly, especially across geography, role family and seniority.
Research quality
Geospatial labour-market evidence is useful, but rarely perfect. This page explains the quality frame used on the public site without exposing operational checks that would make the project easy to replicate.
The research checks whether a signal is broad enough to discuss publicly, especially across geography, role family and seniority.
Findings are compared over time so one noisy month does not become an overstated market claim.
Public analysis uses clear labels such as strong, directional, partial or emerging when evidence strength differs.
Maintenance notes and partner-sensitive research material stay internal to protect the research process.
The most valuable corrections usually come from people working in the market: missing regions, new tools, salary ranges that look wrong, or roles that are described differently in practice.